Study links vaccine to autism

On Jul 27, 4:20 am, Grassy Noll <n....RemoveThis@dallas.org> wrote:
> Jan Drew wrote:
> > > "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A."
>
> Mike Schrimshaw <micha....RemoveThis@sun.aracnet.com> (employee of aracnet)wrote:
>
> We terminated Jerry Kolnick's account because he signed up for service
> with Aracnet under an assumed name (that was not a legal alias) while he
> maintained that his name was Dr. Richard X. Frager, he would not show us
> an Oregon drivers license, nor would he show us proof of being a license
> medical doctor. Since he *falsified* information on his account
> application, we terminated his service.
>
> Kyle Robinson <greyw....RemoveThis@aracnet.com> (employee of aracnet)wrote:
>
> Jerry Kolnick was shut off because he was claiming to be a doctor. When
> aproached about it, he couldn't produce a medical license or doctorial
> certificate to prove he was who he said he was. Here in the
> state of Oregon, practicing medicine without a license is a big no-no. A
> legitimate doctor shouldn't have had a problem getting us proof, which
> this person couldn't do.
>
> The onus of proof was on him, since he was in question. He couldn't
> prove that he was a doctor, yet he was posting and giving medical advise
> as one. When questioned, he tried to deny it, but we had the logs and
> headers of his posts. We don't want that on our system. We refused him
> further service, and last I saw, he's got an account on another provider
> and could again be saying he's a doctor.
>
> Felix Martin <fe....RemoveThis@aracnet.com> (employee of aracnet)wrote:
>
> It is a felony in the State of Oregon to represent yourself as a Doctor,
> an Engineer or a Lawyer. It is in our system agreement that aracnet will
> be only used for lawful purposes. We do not want to be liable or part of
> any deception. As far as I know there are several people in this State
> gathering information for a possible indictment against this person. I
> cannot comment further. This user lied in his application and that by
> itself is grounds enough for termination. He had his opportunity to
> present verifiable information. FYI he has been kicked off from other
> systems.

Excellent job. More proof of his perfidy.